NEW TAYLORMADE P-750 TOUR PROTO IRONS REVIEW

NEW TAYLORMADE P-750 TOUR PROTO IRONS REVIEW
PGA Golf Pro Rick Shiels tests the new TAYLORMADE P-750 TOUR PROTO IRONS REVIEW using the latest foresight GCQuad whilst at the PGA Golf Show in Orlando!

►Become a FREE SUBSCRIBER to RICK SHIELS now
http://bit.ly/SubRickShielsGolf

►GolfWRX Featured writer
http://www.golfwrx.com/

►Golf Monthly Top 25 Golf Coach
http://www.golf-monthly.co.uk/news/notice-board/new-golf-monthly-top-25-uk-coaches-list-revealed-89709

►Official Resort Partner: Lumine
http://www.Lumine.com/

► Official Apparel and footwear partner: Nike Golf
http://www.nike.com/golf
———————————————————————————–
►My Links:
Facebook ► http://bit.ly/RickShielsFB
Twitter ► http://bit.ly/RickShielsTwitter
Instagram ► http://bit.ly/RickShielsIG
Vine ► http://bit.ly/GolfProVine
Web ► http://www.rickshielsgolf.co.uk/
———————————————————————————

26 thoughts on “NEW TAYLORMADE P-750 TOUR PROTO IRONS REVIEW

  1. Rick, comments regarding your personal appearance preferences are completely irrelevant. Please focus on performance and let your viewers make their own decisions regarding cosmetics.

  2. P750 appear to have lofts like blades and muscleback clubs, not like the hybrid player assistance irons. A 35 degree 7 iron, not a 29 degree 7 iron. What sense does it make to just redefine irons by changing lofts to less degrees? At any rate, my question is this: Are these those trampoline face/ thin face clubs? Do you get an extra 10 yards off these clubfaces on the P750s? I hit my muscleback Mizuno 7 iron 160 to 165. What would I get in terms of distance with the P750 7 iron? 170 to 175?

    If these P750 irons offer no help, then I ask the question; why can't a manufacturer just produce a trampoline face set of irons but make the lofts like they should be for the number designation on the club? Like a 35 degree 7 iron, not a 29 degree 7 iron? Too much to ask? Did marketing show that the people with money that can buy the player assistance clubs prefer to lie to themselves? Pretend like they are stronger than they really are? Like "hey, look, I hit my 7 iron175 in the air, even though it is really a 6 iron."

  3. Rick, relax. You are losing your mind with negativity over the P750. They aren't hard to hit and wonderfully shaped.. You played Hogan blades which Maltby PF rate at a miserable 90 on the "playability" scale. The P750 is rated at 401. P770 rated at 518. iBlade at 430.

  4. rick, can we see all the data numbers? i would love to know the spin on these compare to other irons ie p770 and callaway apex pro/ap2s etc. thanks

  5. yes you're not getting distance but you're getting true spins, 7 iron was over 7000 rpms and the 3 iron was almost 4000 rpms I'll take those spins over distance any day

  6. ok so what rick is saying these are just as hard to hit as for instance titleist mb ? they look way more forgiving ,But tbh it doesn´t look like he is swinging the club as well as he can ! u a bit out of shape Rick ?

  7. My 9yr old son is a youtuber (nicolascoolness) and he is completely stoked that I met you and that you hit on the GCQuad, which has been my live for the past 3 years. Nice to have met you at the show!

  8. Rick, your comments on these expose you as a little bit clueless. The best Mizunos of the 80's and 90's were square shaped.. (tp9 etc.). The styling is opinion and better players will like them. They don't need a 'rounded' edge. The fact you can't hit them probably drives the negativity.

Leave a Reply