TaylorMade RSi1 Ping G30 Irons

Get Mark's iPad App http://itunes.apple.com/app/id542855061
Get Mark's iPhone App http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/golf/id456035227
Get Mark's Android App https://market.android.com/details?id=com.golfonline.golfpro
AskGolfGuru iPhone App https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/askgolfguru/id718764309?mt=8
AskGolfGuru iPad App https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/askgolfguru-hd/id718764399?mt=8&ign-mpt=uo%3D2
AskGolfGuru Android App https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.golfonline.golfpro_bluee&hl=en
Like Mark Crossfield on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/askgolfguru

Follow Mark/4golfonline on twitter http://twitter.com/#!/4golfonline

TaylorMade RSi1 Ping G30 Irons reviewed and compared by Mark Crossfield PGA professional AskGolfGuru. The RSi1 with its slots on the bottom and the face offer maximum forgiveness according to TaylorMade where the Ping G30 is maybe one of the most stable golf clubs on the market. See which golf iron might help you play better golf and help you improve your golf game.

28 thoughts on “TaylorMade RSi1 Ping G30 Irons

  1. Currently using the G30s. Respect to the Ping company, no wild claims, no
    trying to open my wallet every 6 months. I would expect the old i2 & G5
    irons to go the same distance as todays offerings but with slightly less
    forgiveness? So heres a request to Mark, be great to see match up, current
    crop of sticks against clubs brought out say 10 years ago hitting the same
    lofted clubs which would account for cranked up stuff of today. If a G10
    driver is good enough for Westy then what does that say about the
    marketing. Length isnt everything as i often remind my Mrs!! Keep the
    original content coming Mr C. & keep CoachLockey off the Tinder website,
    may end up biting off more then he can chew!!

  2. I realize that you are not a pro who is thrilled with the marketing
    campaign of TM but you should really try to keep that bias out of the
    reviews and the head to heads. It hurts your credibility in the long run.
    And I love your videos but to suggest that a person should buy the ping
    and strengthen the lofts (even though they are pretty cranked already, you
    said they were within .5* of TM) in an effort to make them perform like the
    TM, is pretty silly. Shouldnt you simply say that consumers should go out
    and get the TM irons, if they are in the market for new clubs that are in
    that range bc the data you have (albeit limited in sample size) seems to
    prove that the TM is longer, less spinning on a 6 and the peak height is
    pretty similar. It is ok to admit that they make a good iron, and that it
    may out perform a ping club. You dont have to like the tech (and the tech
    might not do what they say) but when you test and get these kinds of
    results, you should leave your TM bias at the door.

  3. G30s slightly less chunky then G15 would say marginal improvement on off
    centre hits & higher flight for me! If happy with G15 then stick with them.
    Most important is to get professionally fitted. Hope this helps. 

  4. Pfffft – my first purchase of new clubs, last Christmas, were discounted
    Lynx Elegance irons. Since then I have replaced all my other clubs with
    Nike tour woods, wedges and a Ping putter – So, of course i look at my
    irons and I think gawd should I have been less hasty and bought better,
    will I replace them again this winter – well these excellent videos say it
    all to me really – I hit the Lynx irons well enough to drop a lob onto a
    par 3 green, the gapping is perfect with my other clubs giving 10ish yards
    between clubs and I can drive the 4i 160-170 yards off the tee – these
    videos suggest that there really isnt much between all these different
    makes of iron – and to be honest, I like the look of the Lynx clubs better
    than most of these offerings; they dont have slots full of plastic in the
    face to degrade or weird spaces in the back to fill with mud, they just
    look like classic but rather chunky blades having an internal cavity and a
    TFT face – I am really starting to love them – advice to the sensible, buy
    the clubs you really like and dont keep looking at everything else with a
    designer label, Mark has shown there really is little performance
    difference between makes and my reliable 10 yards between clubs is more
    important to me than an extra 10 yards. You dont really need distance with
    irons, you take a longer club or a hybrid, you need convenient and accurate
    distance gapping ;-)

  5. I’ve just tried both these clubs last night (as well as a few others) at a
    fitting and I went got the RSi1’s in the end. Both clubs performed
    similarly and I was very impressed with both. It just came down to looks
    and feel for me. I prefered the noise of the RSi’s and I didn’t like the
    finish on the Ping, plus I already have some TaylorMade gear in my bag, so
    after all the numbers were said and done I went with
    feel, aesthetics and allegiance. Funny old game ain’t it!

  6. The dispersion was tighter with the Pings, higher shots and increased back
    spin would be an advantage when hitting in to greens, the Pings did better
    in this also. But you did not mention it in the video

  7. I like the “biased” views that you share with us Mark. That’s exactly what
    I want to hear as it gives me a better idea of what clubs I would likely
    prefer as well. I have hit the G30 irons myself and was surprised at how
    good they felt and gave me the ball flight that I desire, though they will
    not displace my AP1’s. In my humble opinion, I also believe Ping offers
    better engineering and quality control than TM. We are all “biased” and
    there is nothing wrong with admitting so. Asking you to leave your bias
    out is simply another tool of the politically correct crowd, to control
    your freedom of speech. Thank you for sharing your experience and wisdom
    with us Mark. 

  8. One thing TM isn’t in a hurry to tell you. The fine print on the Maximum
    allowed COR RSi1 reads “distance claim based on 4-iron test data. RSi 1
    Irons designed with a COR up to the USGA limit. Due to manufacturing
    tolerances, not all irons will reach the maximum.” So you know, some sets
    might reach the limit, but due to manufacturing tolerances, some won’t.
    Luck of the draw, you know how it is. Wanna buy some?

  9. Why would you automatically want more distance from your irons? My priority
    is to gap my set properly, with reference to my woods and wedges and to
    make sure that the higher irons have a trajectory that lets me hold greens
    on mid range approach shots.

    More distance from your irons = marketing rubbish for idiots.

  10. Love the gunmetal color of the G-30. Wasn’t really in the market for new
    irons until I saw these and realized I like that look over chrome finish I
    have now

  11. Curious to hear what the TM engineers’ rationale is behind less loft & less
    spin… If hitting and holding greens is job #1, why is a lower flight and
    less spin a good thing? Thanks!

  12. Those are really low spin numbers on the TMAG product. That would make the
    shots roll out a bit more, but would make holding greens much harder.

  13. Mark – Most unlike you but you’re clearly biased towards Ping here…. The
    numbers said TaylorMade all day long and yet you couldn’t seem to say it.
    I’m a mizuno man myself and have a thing against TM too but I’m not the one
    doing the ‘neutral’ comparisons!!!

  14. Its all about selling more irons, I used R7 and now TP CBs not much
    different in reality to my game have made the change to a newer tech iron

  15. G30 all the way. The thing with taylormade is that next month, year they
    will release a new iron and you loose value on your current set !

Leave a Reply