@NickSiebert-k8i says:

Pretty good huh…

@tomford3018 says:

I wouldn't need to use my driver just to reach the fairway.

@quietobserver4636 says:

That's EXACTLY like I hit a stinger! 😂😂😂

@George-i1h5o says:

Tiger and his stinger🐯😊.

@mikemiramontes4425 says:

A combination of both power and finesse! Just like Jack Nicklaus!

@federationspace5264 says:

not a stinger, just not perfect contact

@Whitey88-06 says:

Talk about censorship lol 😂 democrats are straight pros 💯

@Whitey88-06 says:

That’s a republican layup, even though he’s a gay liberal lol 😂

@ithinkthonkthunk5333 says:

not a 3 wood

@AaronSmith-4ever says:

For those of you who don't understand how the change in golf equipment hurt Tiger Woods, please, learn something: Better equipment helps golfers who are not as good, golfers who do not hit the face of the club on the nose every time…same with the ball…another player, playing against Tiger doesn't make clean contact but still gets it on the edge of the fairway and still gets 90% of the distance with the new equipment but if those same players played with the older equipment, they would have only gotten 70% of the distance and would have been in the rough with the same swing that they made with the new equipment. However, when you have Tiger who nuts it every single hit and even PLAYED LESS QUALITY EQUIPMENT BY CHOICE at points because he was so good he wanted the ability to move the ball as much as he wanted in both directions because he had control over it while the other golfers wanted the club to keep the ball straight for them because they had no confidence in their ability, especially compared to Tiger.

So, if anything, the equipment HURT TIGER's records and HELPED Jacks.

Further, Jack played the best golfers in the world 3-4 times a year. By the 80s, they added a 5th with the Players. Thats it!!!

Tiger played all four majors, the four WGC events, the four, then three playoff events…the Tour Championship…He on average played 10-12 events a year where every single player in the top 70 to the top 120 players in the world where in the field. Jack did that 3-4 times a year until Americans finally started playing the Open every year and only got to 5 when the Players Championship became a thing. So Tiger played against DEEPER FIELDS where MORE PEOPLE WERE CAPABLE OF WINNING (in Jack's day, the same 5 people won a majority of the big events and jack may have been the best back then but…

….Tiger had more pressure, Tiger was in better shape, he had a better swing, he was a better chipper, a better putter, won more tournaments, won more player of the year awards, won more vardon trophies, has more records than Jack by FAR…

And if its about comparing how good the player is compared to the people they are competing against? Tiger's winning percentage and top 3 and top 5 percentages, in majors and regular events TOWERS over Jacks…even if you stop counting Jack's events when he won hiks last major at age 46.

Jack was great, second greatest ever but he had the advantage of out of shape white guys who didn't practice but 1/4 the amount of time as players today, had no swing coaches, no head coaches, no technology to help them, no special equipment to help worse players keep up with better players….

…I'm just a golfer but people who try to put Jack above Tiger are the racists because Jack never had ANY period where he dominated like Tiger did…and Tiger went through 3 separate dominate periods that Jack never even sniffed.

Check out Tiger's scoring average records and see if Jack ever came close (scoring average records adjust for the field so a player cant be harmed because they may have played rounds in harder conditions)…Tiger holds the lowest scoring average record in history BY FAR at 67.794…he did it once in 2000, arguably the greatest season in the history of the game….but he also did it again in 2007. But a lot of you didnt even know that.

@HurleyJohnson-i1z says:

A beautiful thing to watch.