► Golf Monthly Technical Editor Joel Tadman compares the looks and performance of the new TaylorMade M3 and M4 irons.
► Become a FREE SUBSCRIBER to Golf Monthly's YouTube page now – https://www.youtube.com/golfmonthly
► For the latest reviews, new gear launches and tour news, visit our website here – http://www.golf-monthly.co.uk/
► Like us on Facebook here – https://www.facebook.com/GolfMonthlyMagazine
►Follow us on Twitter here – https://twitter.com/GolfMonthly
►Feel free to comment below!
►Remember to hit that LIKE button if you enjoyed it 🙂
){kind=link}
Outstanding Joel. Concise and to the point with all relevant data covered…
I have gone through three sets of M2’s all three had face slots break out of them. Unbelievable that they brought that horrible design flaw back
M4 driving iron
After the faces caving in on M1 and M2 irons you would have thought taylormade would've done away with the face slots…
I think the M4 iron looks terrible
No spin …….
I bought the M1 last year and I really enjoy playing with them. I did try the M2 but it was uncontrollable for me – a full 7i to a green should stop on the green, with the M1 I could do that, with the M2 I could not.
What worries me about the M3 is the low spin – that looks too low to me – and the addition of tungsten weighting in the toe. This is something the MP18-MMC has. This was a club I tried, like M1 it was really easy to hit, ball launches high but with the MMC it gave me more of a draw shape than I am comfortable with which I attribute to the the toe tungsten weight and angular momentum. I would worry that the M3 would be the same.
Looking forward to M1 v M3 testing!
M4 ugly club imo
Joe Tadman… ALMOST Joe Trackman… Would of been dope
do you have the m3 and m4 drivers?