Single Plane Golf Swing POV—How Moe Norman Made Consistent Impact Review
ChatGPT said:
A single-plane golf swing, popularized by legendary golfer Moe Norman, has garnered significant attention for its simplicity and consistency. Let's dive into the mechanics of this unique swing and explore how Moe Norman mastered it for consistent impact.
Moe Norman's Single Plane Swing Key Points:
- Address Position: The most defining feature of the single-plane swing is the setup. Moe Norman positioned himself in a way that his arms and the club formed a straight line at address, minimizing unnecessary movement. This alignment puts the body in an ideal position to swing on a single plane.
- Simplified Movement: Unlike a traditional swing, which often relies on a multi-plane motion, the single-plane swing reduces complexity. The club travels back and through on nearly the same path, resulting in more consistent ball striking.
- Weight Transfer: Moe emphasized a quiet lower body during the backswing, keeping the focus on stability and precision. His unique stance and hip movement allowed for optimal weight transfer during impact.
- Impact Consistency: Moe’s ability to hit the ball with precision was due to his repeatable mechanics. By maintaining the same plane throughout the swing, he minimized variables that could lead to mishits.
Why Review the Single Plane Swing?
For golfers struggling with traditional swing inconsistencies, adopting elements of Moe Norman’s approach could lead to improved performance. His technique eliminates some of the most common errors, such as over-rotation or improper wrist hinge.
POV: Experiencing the Single Plane Swing
When trying the single-plane swing, it may initially feel unusual, but the benefits become evident over time. The reduction in moving parts allows for easier replication, especially under pressure.
Moe Norman’s legacy reminds us that simplicity can often lead to mastery in golf. If consistency is your goal, the single-plane swing is worth exploring.
ChatGP
David Leadbetter and Moe Norman represent two distinct schools of thought in the golf swing philosophy. While Moe Norman's Single Plane Swing emphasizes simplicity and consistency, Leadbetter's approach focuses on a traditional, multi-plane swing with greater adaptability for individual golfers. Let’s break down how the two compare:
Moe Norman's Single Plane Swing
Core Philosophy:
- Minimize complexity by keeping the swing on one plane from address to impact.
- Prioritize repeatability and consistency over power or flexibility.
Key Features:
- Straight Line Setup: Arms and the club align at address, forming a “single plane” that simplifies the takeaway and downswing.
- Quiet Lower Body: Moe’s lower body movement was minimal, allowing for a more stable base and consistent contact.
- Focus on Accuracy: By reducing variables in the swing, golfers achieve reliable ball striking, even under pressure.
- Ideal for Amateurs: Its simplicity makes it appealing for those who struggle with traditional mechanics.
Pros:
- Highly repeatable swing.
- Less reliance on timing and athleticism.
- Reduced strain on the body due to efficient mechanics.
Cons:
- Less versatility for shaping shots.
- Not as much focus on maximizing distance.
David Leadbetter's Swing Philosophy
Core Philosophy:
- Optimize the swing for each individual golfer based on their body type, flexibility, and skill level.
- Emphasize proper sequencing and dynamic motion to create power and control.
Key Features:
- Multi-Plane Swing: Traditional takeaway and backswing incorporate a more “rounded” or multi-planar path.
- Dynamic Lower Body: Leadbetter encourages active use of the legs and hips for generating power and rotational speed.
- Custom Approach: Tailors the swing to the golfer, allowing for adjustments in grip, posture, and mechanics to suit their strengths.
- Emphasis on Timing: The swing relies on precise sequencing of body parts to achieve powerful and consistent results.
Pros:
- Adaptable to different skill levels and styles.
- Greater potential for power and distance.
- Allows more creativity for shaping shots.
Cons:
- Requires more practice and athletic ability to perfect.
- More moving parts mean more room for error.
- Timing-dependent, which can lead to inconsistency under pressure.
Comparison
Aspect | Moe Norman (Single Plane) | David Leadbetter (Multi-Plane) |
---|---|---|
Swing Complexity | Simplified, single-plane mechanics | Multi-plane mechanics with tailored adjustments |
Focus | Consistency and accuracy | Power, adaptability, and shot shaping |
Body Movement | Quiet lower body, minimal rotation | Dynamic lower body, rotational power |
Learning Curve | Easier to learn, ideal for beginners | Steeper learning curve, better for advanced golfers |
Versatility | Limited shot-shaping capabilities | Allows creative and versatile shot-making |
Reliability | Highly reliable under pressure | Timing-dependent, can falter under stress |
Distance | Moderate focus on power | Strong emphasis on generating distance |
Which Approach Is Better for You?
- If simplicity and consistency are your priorities, or if you’re an amateur seeking an easier swing to master, Moe Norman’s Single Plane Swing is an excellent choice.
- If you’re a more advanced golfer looking for adaptability, creativity, and the ability to maximize power, Leadbetter’s method offers more flexibility and shot-making potential.
Both philosophies have their merits, and the right choice depends on your goals, experience level, and physical capabilities. Golfers could even borrow elements from both—using Moe's simplified setup for consistency while integrating Leadbetter's dynamic lower body techniques for power.
Hey, Todd. So, I'm confused as to why this wasn't mentioned in your single plane swing BOOK. The issue with the driver is EXACTLY what I'm finding, but the solution this whole time was your "offset foot position". I feel like the feet open, square, and closed would have been pivotal in your book.
Good point!
Mr. Graves, thank you for showing videos of Mow Norman and preserving his technique and amazing shots as well as his personality. Very good videos. Just a suggestion, but Mow was too short and simple in his explanations, like we should already know what was obvious to him and your demonstrations are a bit complicated and involve so many things at once. Be nice if a happy medium between both. Might be more effective.
The video angles and close ups are great. Thanks, for what you do.
I'll be watching
Light bulb went off. U r the man
Ive been having trouble with single plane swing until i watched this video. I was so suprised at how more consistent i was just by changing my feet positions based on what club im using. I had been using a slightly closed stance for a clubs and i averaged 84 since starting the single plane. After this video i shot 78 today.
I own the footboard, the 6 iron with the grip and a swing trainer. Super tools worth the money and then some. And a Sandy Andy with your grip as well. Not complicated really with practice.once the foot positions are second nature this becomes so easy.
HI Todd,
You are using a 3 iron but all sets of golf club's start 5 iron??
Take your meds. Moe never put the clubface behind the ball he played everything of the hosel of the club then his hip slide compensated
Question. I just purchased one of these from your website store. I use single length/lie irons that are made to a 6 iron length. Am I correct to assume my trail foot position would be the same then for all my irons? Probably around the 6-7 area? Thanks.
This was great! Years of struggling to understand these concepts have been solved in a 7 minute clip. My God! I owe Todd Graves a debt of gratitude. I'm invested in the club trainer and the training board. Think I'm going to get the chipping/short-game training board next. Thank you, Todd!
I haven't played in 18 years, this intrigues me. So, when you set club next to ball, Club face is open, then square with body tilt?
The “logic” behind what and why Todd teaches what he does is what drew me to the sps. Every other instructor just doesn’t make rational sense to me. Love everything you do, Todd.
Was Moe stance closed to is Target slightly ??
Excellent video Todd highlighting the camera angles from your viewpoint looking at the ball! Great job explaining the “why” behind the different setups with the stance of the golf swing. Keep up the great work!
I really enjoy these videos by Todd Graves. With the proper setup, I can just turn back and let my torso fall into the pivot and just land at the forward flexed left knee. The arms, driven by this reliable pivot, just whip back to where they started, resulting in good contact and the ball goes so straight with a reliable distance. Thanks.
I ordered the Single Plan Alignment Ball Position Trainer. I didn't receive any directions with the Trainer i.e., what are the labeled abbreviations on the Trainer. I also ordered the Grip Trainer 6 Iron. Again no directions. Can someone at Graves Golf please advise. Thank you. Can't wait to try these out. It's been too cold in NJ. 😉
Thanks that helps tremendously as I was setting up perfectly square and kept hitting my driver left with a draw and sometimes a hook and my short irons right
Best video so far, I've been looking for this info. Thanks
I’m confused…The inset framed picture appears you address the ball on the heel of the club, but the video shows the club head directly behind the ball. Which is correct?
is this available to the UK?
Yes! Thank you! I was slow figuring this out at range over last months and after this vid it finally clicked! many thanks!
This was one of the best videos on SPS ball position. The POV really helps with understanding the finer points of the model.
Holy crap I’ve been lining up my DBP to the little hole lol I will have to change it when I go to the range
Thank you!!! explaining the radius with POV cam really helped me understand what is going on.
The golf swing is a precision "machine" and we are just the "operator". As such, every change we make that deviates from the ideal position complicates and depreciates the performance. So nice to have a method to our "madness". Thanks Todd.
One thing that has just occurred to me is that the days that I have been hitting it really good I think I have been inadvertently stumbling across the optimal swing arc/radius position with my driver. Now that I know to look for it I am very excited that my consistency levels are about to sky rocket !! Thanks. Tim
From what I've seen Moe leans to the right much more than this and his feet are quite a bit wider when using the driver compared to the instructor.
This clears up the confusion I was having!. It was driving me nuts before! Thank you for posting this. Just wondering then as a "check and balance" is it a good idea to play around with my radius as you have here on the range just to get a better feel for what happens to my arc based on what I do with my stance width/opening and closing of my stance? Many Thanks. Tim
What a video Todd! Good Sheeet!!
Question dealing with club face at setup. Around the 125 mark you say the club is square to feet like… and the feet line is ‘open’ to target line. So my question is when setting up with wedge, and the wedge is usually set up a couple inches behind ball…. Is the club face square to target or feet? You have me ver confused.
When setting up driver and the head is many inches behind ball … is it square to target line, open to target line because by the time it reaches the ball it will be square….
Hope someone can help me out?!?