How To Effectively Play Golf

@kjustkses says:

I cant find the square glm in South Africa ????

@livewireJJ says:

Hey garage golfers, Square golf period.

@willjones3908 says:

Square has completely changed my opinion on sim golf. I just can’t see why you’d spend 000s more when Square gives you ball & club data, connects to GSPro, has no subscription charge. What am I missing?

@johns5870 says:

You can’t but the pro tee VX form Golfroom Eu if you are in the Uk – you may want to remove that link mate. Anywhere else you can get it from?

@125phr says:

Protee Vx is awesome ???? !!

@bridgta35 says:

Thanks for the great content! I'm also narrowed my decision down to GC3 or Protee VX for my new home simulator setup. My son is a lefty and I'm a righty, so I'm slightly leaning towards the overhead unit, however, I do like the portability of the GC3. I heard that you do not have to recalibrate the GC3 going from left to right and most of the time we would be playing at different times as well. Our room is right at 14ft, so the bigger hitting area of the Protee would be a plus as well. Let me know if you have any thoughts on this, it's really hard for me to pass up the GC3 for some reason, lol. Thanks

@John-ei5uz says:

Nice video again. I have been using the MLM2PRO for about 18 months now and also use a pretty high end optical monitor that gives all ball and club data. I compared the Mevo+ with the optical monitor and all ball data was virtually identical. The problem with the Mevo+ is that it doesn't pick up poorly struck shots where gear effect comes into play very accurately at all compared to the optical device. I then compared the Mevo+ with the MLM2PRO and had virtually the same outcome. Backspin was almost always the same between the 2 devices but sidespin was sometimes really different affecting shot shape greatly. I tended to trust the MLM2PRO more than the Mevo+ because its obvious the MLM2PRO was picking up backspin from the markings on the ball accurately using its camera and theoretically if it can see the patterns on the ball accurately for backspin there is no reason it wouldn't be seeing the patterns accurately for spin axis also. The Mevo+ however is a single Doppler radar unit and I don't know how a single radar can actually see both backspin and sidespin of the ball. I'm not saying it can't but it is not getting accurate spin readings when compared to the units using cameras to measure spin. Also, the Mevo+ was terrible reading short chip shots with a ball speed under 20mph making it really frustrating to use when playing simulator golf. I have the Pro Package on the Mevo+ and feel the club data is good enough so I use it in conjunction with my optical launch monitor to get club data without having to put stickers on my clubs. So I hook my optical launch monitor and up to GSPro and have the Mevo+ running through FS Golf on a second monitor just so I can see the club data also. I think that is the future of budget launch monitors. Surely someone can create a system incorporating and optical device part like the Square Golf with a radar as cheap as the Garmin R10 and end up getting something as goos as a Trackman indoors.

@PeteSchmidt says:

If you mute the sound it kinda looks like you’re making a rap video. Great videos and very informative! Thank you

@LukeKnight-c8v says:

By the time my kids leave home and I can put a golf room/simulator in the garden, I'd have seen 100s of your videos.