TaylorMade Burner 2.0 SuperFast R11 Drivers

Share it with your friends Like

http://www.4golfonline.com Mark Crossfield hits the two Taylormade drivers with the white heads. The Burner 2.0 SuperFast and the R11. See which driver might help you play some better golf and hit more fairways.

Comments

chachifeere says:

I used a demo burner tp and didnt really like it too much, shape was
terrible, colour ok, felt like i was hitting rocks didnt really feel like
it jump off the face that much. still use my R7 SQ with prolauch axis and
feels like the ball explodes off the shaft feels very nice.

SaVeFaRis7 says:

i have the superfast and it really is surprisingly loud scared me first
time i hit it haha but the results are totally worth the earplugs!

Rahul Garhwal says:

Hi Mark, I have recently bought Superfast burner 2.0, I love the feel of it
more than other clubs in the market but 46.5 shaft length is very hard to
control, do you think I can cut it down to 44.5 without changing the feel
of the club too much?..Im high handicap..what do you recommend?

DBrodieAllen says:

ive been trying an R11 but dont think i can afford it, thats why ive been
looking into a superfast 2.0, im also not the talest im about 5 foot 5 and
my handicap is 18 so what would be the best for me?

Gustavo Rueda says:

Hit my longest drive ever(275) with the 2.0,love that club !

Dave Longden-Thurgood says:

Hi Mark, another excellent video. I did have the R11 driver but didn’t get
the distance I was used to with my old Burner Superfast 1 (mainly down to
the shaft length) I’ve been trying out a friend’s Burner Superfast 2.0 and
it’s lovely to get the extra distance back (20 yards longer than R11) It
does feel a bit long though and I want to hit more fairways. Do you think
if I cut 0.5″ off the grip end of the shaft I would get better strikes or
would it change the swing weight too much and ruin it

ScratchrBust51 says:

Mark thanks so much for the excellent videos. I wonder if you could help
with a problem that I think is pretty common. With the longer clubs I can
take beautiful practices with perfect finishes. When I actually hit my shot
I don’t seem to be able to finish. I feel like my hands are stuck finishing
down the target line and I cant seem to finish my swing. Any ideas? Help!

oilcity97 says:

hey mark, could you do a comparison between the taylormade 2.0 driver, and
the ping i20..im getting a driver and im really stuck between the two…

5150markg says:

I have an R11 and love it – hit one 353yds last week! Don’t like the burner
– the stretched back head shape, length, sound, grip – everything!

titleistfan16 says:

could u make a vid comparing the 910 f and the 910 d like hitting them off
the ground and tee and tell me what you think the difference is like. Thanks

Douglas Smith says:

hate these drivers, too light, it’s like hitting the ball with a plank od
wood

Alan Bonner says:

@jdl871. Would highly recommend the burner 09 irons. Btw, I have some for
sale! :o)

b1zzare says:

The R11 is a beast. Love it! Are you planning on hitting the SuperFast 2.0
FWs at all? Would love to see a comparison between the TP and maybe with
the R11 FW.

Wade Cole says:

What is your favourite driver?

dhsieh911018 says:

hey mark i know u’ve already done a iron comparison between the superfast
2.0 and rbz but can you also give a comparison video of the superfast 2.0
driver and rbz pls?~~~

Juan Pablo Salazar says:

Great video there! I tried the r11 a couple weeks back, before going for
the 910D3. It is actually a very nice club… with the exeption of the
colour. Ok, anti glaring and all that stuff, but seriously… White? it may
not glare, but it reflects like crazy! my eyes hurt just by looking at it,
would´ve been easier to go for a mate black finish and it would have done
the job much better! The other thing i didnt like is how loud the club is!
Almost deafening in closed driving ranges!

forzaitalia456 says:

Would the driver be impacted if I reduce the shaft

imjrex says:

i have the original burner and haven’t truly tried many other clubs because
im new to the golf scene. i have to say the original is good because i’m
new and im hitting constant 200’s 90% of the time

Ben Otto says:

i’m in love with the burner 2.0 not the r11 but they are both great clubs

goldenglove25 says:

shut the hell up and hit the fuckers

Sam Winstanley says:

All this said I think a fairer comparison (based on price) would be the SF
TP vs. R11 (non TP). For me SF TP, shortened by 0.75 inches each end then
reweighted by 3g in toe and 5g in heel is perfect, I could get the same
setup from an R11 but then I’d have 100 settings I’d never use. Please say
something about shortening drivers.. 46″ is a crazy length for an amateur,
hardly any pro’s on tour play over 44.5″.

Troy O'Brien says:

@titleistfan16 He already did

Vic Guha says:

ill stick with my trusty r9 supertri 🙂 too many things to worry about in
r11 ans SF2.0 is way too long

David W says:

it sounds like a percussion instrument (both of them do). I recall the
finest sounding driver I ever had – a yonex adx 200 way back in the
early/mid 90s. Seemed like a big club back then, had an indestructible
shaft (a lot of drivers didn’t back then) and made a satisfying woody whack
when hit.

jdl871 says:

would you recommend the Taylormade Burner 1.0 for a novice golfer?

Lloyd D says:

I own the burner2.0 and the R11 and for me the burner wins. The shaft on
the burner is longer 46.5 inch which is for distance but if you want the
smaller shaft burner 2.0 the tp version is 45.5inch. I couldn’t get on with
the R11 which I have been told that not many people can so I tried the
burner and found it so much better to use. I did have the shaft fitted
smaller so it’s 45.5inch for better control.

123garryharry says:

at first i did want the r11 but now looking at the price and the way it
hits i much more preffer the burner superfast 2.0 and at a lower price
thats the one for me

cubsrock10997 says:

i personally think the r11 sounds so much duller off the tee. but its still
a good driver. i have the burner 2.0 and i had to get it shortened by 2″
because a 46.5″ driver is just far to long for a high school player such as
myself and since i got it shortened i average about 275-290 with it and
before i got it shortened it was like 250 at the most because i sliced it
so bad lol but i love it now. =) also the stock grip is junk but i love my
new grip on it

Kevin Nakai says:

I would go with the 2.0 and just get it cut down

cole weber says:

ya, its probably loud because your partly inside, idiot, and they both are
the same loudness to me

BBettridge97 says:

Hurts my ears just listening to the 2.0 on the computer LOL.

prorobo says:

I was hoping the SF 2.0’s extremely loud impact sound wouldn’t be as
apparent outdoors but it seems you’ve confirmed that is an issue. I’ll be
demoing the R11 pretty soon to make my decision between the SF 2.0, R11, or
Titleist 910 I’d love to see your back-to-back reviews of the SF 2.0 and
R11 TP versions!

BubbaWatsonfan15 says:

what kind of camera do you use?

theMANxGOLFER says:

I like the TP R11 because of the 19 shaft options. Can you talk about what
driver shaft you would use w2ith the TM R11 TP.

Jon Gough says:

well i can anser that the r11 has gone far down in price if you cant afford
it the burner superfast 2.0 is great its quite loud and tingy i love a
longer shaft you have to be able to control it thought best of luck! any
more questions just ask me

vabigpoppa says:

whats the song at the beginning of your vids?

Douglas Smith says:

@creep426 I actually play with the older machspeed lol

Write a comment